Thread: [C^3] 2016 CA Regionals Analysis
View Single Post
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-09-2016, 20:03
Caleb Sykes's Avatar
Caleb Sykes Caleb Sykes is offline
Registered User
FRC #4536 (MinuteBots)
Team Role: Mentor
  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 1,053
Caleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [C^3] 2016 CA Regionals Analysis
I'm having trouble interpreting the second set of graphs (Breaching success, quals and Breaching success, playoffs). In casd quals, the breaching success of the drawbridge is ~20%. Does this mean that the opponent defenses were breached in 20% of the matches in which the drawbridge was selected? Does this mean that the drawbridge was selected in 20% of matches in which a breach occurred? Or are you conflating breaches with weakenings?
Reply With Quote