View Single Post
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-09-2016, 20:29
GKrotkov's Avatar
GKrotkov GKrotkov is offline
Registered User
AKA: Gabriel Krotkov
FRC #1712 (Dawgma)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Ardmore, PA
Posts: 118
GKrotkov has much to be proud ofGKrotkov has much to be proud ofGKrotkov has much to be proud ofGKrotkov has much to be proud ofGKrotkov has much to be proud ofGKrotkov has much to be proud ofGKrotkov has much to be proud ofGKrotkov has much to be proud of
Re: [C^3] 2016 CA Regionals Analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caleb Sykes View Post
I'm having trouble interpreting the second set of graphs (Breaching success, quals and Breaching success, playoffs). In casd quals, the breaching success of the drawbridge is ~20%. Does this mean that the opponent defenses were breached in 20% of the matches in which the drawbridge was selected? Does this mean that the drawbridge was selected in 20% of matches in which a breach occurred? Or are you conflating breaches with weakenings?
Judging by TBA's insights page, the graph shows the percent of times that the defense was damaged of all the times that it was on the field, at each event. With the exception of the black line, which shows the overall breach rate.

Last edited by GKrotkov : 10-09-2016 at 20:33.
Reply With Quote