Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard
All solid teams you listed, for sure.
However, 610 had the highest scoring average in our division by 7 points per our scouting data(greater than us, and all the teams in our division).
They were a great group to play with, and we'd definitely pick them again given the information available to us at the time.
in SF 2, all 3 teams missed in auto and performed on the lower end of our averages. This combined with a great performance from 2122, 3538 and 2052 cost us the bracket.
|
Needless to say scouting at champs was a little crazy for us with our <24 hour notice that we were needed there as a backup. We had two people in the stands for every match. Take everything a I say with a sleep deprivation fueled triple scouted grain of salt.
Our data showed that 610 just ahead of you at 3rd offense wise. Our Tator overlords 2122, and 225 we're 1 and 2. Let's ignore that though and look at numbers you didn't mention. Output and accuracy
Our data also showed that 225 scored an average of 4.2 high goals per match vs 610's 3.6. Both those teams hit about 75% The best high goaler on the field by my findings was 5895 though. 4,4 goals per match at 90% accuracy? yes please!
Sorry for the bad luck in auto. You guys had insane accuracy! On the other hand 610 missed 50% of their auto shots in quals according to our data, 2474 missed every single auto shot in quals, as did 319. The most accurate auto shooters in the field were 5895, you guys,525,225,3824, and somehow us, 1625(what did they put in our batteries man? Champs went way too well!)
The last thing to report from my findings, on the remark that you guys scored on the low end of your average. From my data, the sum of your quals averages was 135, low would be about 100, high would be about 210. Obviously your alliance had great synergy, and you did great in Quarters! 3538 played monster defense on 610, and it held your score down. Other teams had robots with faster lineups and better shooting position that may have eliminated this issue.
Listen, I'm not trying to rip apart your decisions or say anything bad about teams here. I'm trying to demonstrate how different analysis of this data could have shed light on these issues before they cost you the bracket. We all have 20/20 hindsight now, and It's time to look back as objectively as possible to see how we can all improve.
-All the best
P.S. Again, I completely understand how harsh this may come off, it's not my aim. I'm sorry.