View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-14-2016, 07:20 PM
Munchskull's Avatar
Munchskull Munchskull is offline
CAD Designer/ Electrical Consaltant
AKA: Anthony Cardinali
FRC #0997 (Spartan Robotics)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 491
Munchskull is a splendid one to beholdMunchskull is a splendid one to beholdMunchskull is a splendid one to beholdMunchskull is a splendid one to beholdMunchskull is a splendid one to beholdMunchskull is a splendid one to beholdMunchskull is a splendid one to behold
Re: pic: 2.5in gearbox

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mechvet View Post
Looks good so far!

What led to your choice of 2.5" colsons?

What gears are you using? I ask this because at smaller tooth counts for a more compact gearbox, you *might* be approaching the limit for some materials, such as aluminum. (note: I have done zero calculations for a smaller box. I'd suggest running some lewis gear numbers to see if you're inside the gear's envelope)

Am I correct in assuming that the two sprockets inside the gearbox mean this is for a WCD setup? If that's the case, how are you planning to mate this gearbox to the frame rail?
The gearbox would be mounted using the lower 10-32 bolts that would mount the CI'M motors, in total there would be 3 10-32 bolts holding the CIM motors and the gearbox on.

I used 2.5" where's because my personal philosophy is that the smaller the wheel you design for the small your gearbox can be. I posted this because I fear I am missing some torque related risks of small wheels.

The chain is #25 because small wheels should (if I did my math right) require less torque to move and rotate.

Are there any disadvantages of 2.5in wheels I may have missed? (assuming that high centering is not an issue)
__________________
“In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not.” ― Anonymous
Anthony Cardinali
4th year of FRC
Class of 2017



Reply With Quote