View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-14-2016, 08:13 PM
Chak Chak is offline
Registered User
AKA: Thomas
FRC #4159 (Cardinalbotics)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: May 2015
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: San Francisco, California, USA
Posts: 250
Chak has a brilliant futureChak has a brilliant futureChak has a brilliant futureChak has a brilliant futureChak has a brilliant futureChak has a brilliant futureChak has a brilliant futureChak has a brilliant futureChak has a brilliant futureChak has a brilliant futureChak has a brilliant future
Re: pic: 2.5in gearbox

Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchskull View Post
The gearbox would be mounted using the lower 10-32 bolts that would mount the CI'M motors, in total there would be 3 10-32 bolts holding the CIM motors and the gearbox on.

I used 2.5" where's because my personal philosophy is that the smaller the wheel you design for the small your gearbox can be. I posted this because I fear I am missing some torque related risks of small wheels.

The chain is #25 because small wheels should (if I did my math right) require less torque to move and rotate.

Are there any disadvantages of 2.5in wheels I may have missed? (assuming that high centering is not an issue)
Doesn't that mean that you would have to assemble the gearbox directly onto the drivetrain, instead of assembling it somewhere else and mounting it on? That would be more annoying imo. From what I can see, there's space to add some mounting holes and avoid that complication.
__________________
Reply With Quote