Thread: STEM vs. STEAM
View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-09-2016, 00:27
Philip Arola's Avatar
Philip Arola Philip Arola is offline
You can check out any time you like
AKA: KG7VAM
FRC #1510 (Wildcats), FRC #2898 (The Flying Hedgehogs)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 72
Philip Arola is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: STEM vs. STEAM

Quote:
Originally Posted by wajirock View Post
Marketing FIRST solely as a STEM program does not properly include those aspects of FIRST; as more and more teams make the fine arts a more integrated part of their team and culture, and in turn the culture of FIRST, it is important that FIRST accurately markets itself as what it has in store for future innovators.
We teach how to use a first aid kit to our members. Should we now call it SHTEAM (Science Health Tech Engineering Arts Math)?

Nothing exists in a vacuum. I don't know of anyone who actually thinks the arts are useless, and have zero place in FIRST. The point is what the emphasis of the program is. One of the goals of FIRST is to make scientists and engineers "rock stars." Many artists are already immensely popular, they don't need the extra boost compared to scientists. Sure, Steven Hawking is popular, but honestly, more artists are well known than scientists.
__________________
Cunningham's Law: The best way to get the right answer on the Internet is not to ask a question, it's to post the wrong answer.

Last edited by Philip Arola : 21-09-2016 at 00:31.
Reply With Quote