|
Re: Tuning PID Constants Over a Range
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Copioli
Eli,
While your statement is true, we have found that simply putting a motion profile on your input will eliminate the need for cascading control.
To me, the motion profile (whichever you choose .. we use trapezoidal acceleration) is a more pure way to do it. We all know that if you give a step input to a motor it really doesn't behave that way so why not give it an input it really can perform.
We have found that motion profile + feedforward gain + PID work for all of our telemetry navigation needs, whether it be for driving or moving a ridiculously complicated arm.
Austin and his crew use state space, but I am too simplistic for all that awesomeness so I stick with profile + FF + PID.
Paul
|
We're working on motion profiling this preseason - I entirely agree that it's a conceptually better way to do it.
__________________
"Mmmmm, chain grease and aluminum shavings..."
"The breakfast of champions!"
Member, FRC Team 449: 2007-2010
Drive Mechanics Lead, FRC Team 449: 2009-2010
Alumnus/Technical Mentor, FRC Team 449: 2010-Present
Lead Technical Mentor, FRC Team 4464: 2012-2015
Technical Mentor, FRC Team 5830: 2015-2016
|