Thread: Tuning PID Constants Over a Range
View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-09-2016, 14:45
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
Joining the 900 Meme Team
FRC #0079
  
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,069
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Tuning PID Constants Over a Range
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared Russell View Post
I agree that a motion profile + feedforward to overcome static friction can solve this problem adequately for FRC purposes. However, the Talon SRX makes precise 1KHz velocity control stupidly easy to achieve; hiding the stiction nonlinearity behind a Talon and using plain old position PID is just as workable a solution these days. (But is still improved by using a motion profile of course)
Are you saying for heading changes, let's assume turn in place, you'd suggest figuring out how far the wheels need to turn and then just position PID them (with or without motion profile) ?
__________________




.
Reply With Quote