[frcguy]

Originally Posted by Chris is me

The big problem is that the USB spec limits the length of most USB cables to shorter lengths than Ethernet. Ethernet is designed to be used over longer distances than USB. In practice you're probably fine either way, but Ethernet is what we "should" be using IMO

Yep, I agree that Ethernet is the ideal tethering method. For us however, tethering was limited to just testing things in either our pit or in queue, and we didn't need the longer distance that Ethernet can handle. If we needed to test on the practice field or some other long distance tether we had a long Ethernet cable ready.

Originally Posted by bobbysq

Also, I don't believe you get full access to the robot's LAN when using USB. This is important if you used vision tracking with an external processor like us this year.

This is correct as well, although we didn't have issues with that this season (low goal robot ).