View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-10-2016, 13:40
carpedav000's Avatar
carpedav000 carpedav000 is offline
Studenting is hard, but worth it!
AKA: David Carpenter
no team (Jerry-Rigg school of DuctTapeology)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 464
carpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant futurecarpedav000 has a brilliant future
Re: pic: High Traction Drivetrain Concept

Quote:
Originally Posted by S1LK0124 View Post
I don't know if anybody else asked this but, what is the likelihood of it tearing up the carpet? I know that the drivetrain isn't like ours from this year in the sense that we used tank treads instead of a wheel-based drive, but our drivetrain had a lot of traction, and when combined with the high torque that we had, our treads tore up the carpet a few times, resulting in a few deactivations. We later combatted this by reducing the top speed of the robot so our deceleration wouldn't be as fast, and reducing the amount of torque. I don't know if you've already considered that, but I really like your design and I don't want it to run into trouble should you wind up using it!
I don't think this would neccessarily be an issue for this drivetrain. It isn't using roughtop/grooved/patterned wheels and the contact area on the carpet is much less than a treaded drivetrain (especially treaded drivetrains that have layouts identical to or similar to yours).
__________________
It isn't shiny enough.
Reply With Quote