View Single Post
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-11-2016, 14:58
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is offline
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,601
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
Re: Swerve vs. Butterfly Drivetrain

To answer the OP's question - there really is almost no software complexity to butterfly drives, and the mechanical complexity is much less but still significant. Swerve drives are very taxing both mechanically and software wise.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
Source on the bolded section because Im about the turn on the Ether signal and claim that, in fact, omni directional drives (mecanum and killough platforms) are capable of more complex motion because they are true omni directional capable. This is because they can control each degree of freedom they operate in (x,y,orientation) at any point in time compared to a steered wheel system which has some lag in controlling these degrees of freedom.
Butterfly drives are generally defined as 4 traction / 4 omni on pivots, and have no inherent ability to strafe.

Even with the addition of a sideways strafing wheel, they are significantly worse at strafing about an arbitrary center of rotation, or translating while rotating at the same time.
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
...2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
---
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
...2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design
...2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
...2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
...2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 Minnesota 10,000 Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)
Reply With Quote