View Single Post
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-11-2016, 12:04
XaulZan11's Avatar
XaulZan11 XaulZan11 is offline
Registered User
AKA: John Christiansen
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milwaukee, Wi
Posts: 1,326
XaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond reputeXaulZan11 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to XaulZan11
Re: Swerve vs. Butterfly Drivetrain

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard View Post
Odd, I view this one the other way.

We'd be pretty terrified picking a swerve that late in the draft if we also didn't really, really trust that team's ability to keep it running.
Yeah, I see what you are saying and I agree with it at the districts/regionals. There are many examples of swerve drives doing well at the championship as 3rd/4th robots (1640 off the top of my head). Assuming I could trust it, I would probably pick a swerve drive over a tank drive as a 3rd/4th robot.

My main point was that although a butterfly is more 'advanced', it will likely be viewed as a negative compared to a tank drive when it comes to 3rd/4th robot. When we did butterfly in 2014, several top teams expressed concern or dissatisfaction with it. Fair or unfair, there is some negative stigma attached to butterfly drives.
Reply With Quote