Quote:
Originally Posted by MARS_James
I am curious as to why but I think this is actually a rule that if implemented could potentially be used unfairly. Lets say we have an event with 27 teams and 9 fantasy teams in the league in theory the teams should score in a point system similar to 27 down to 1 meaning the 9th pick gets 19, 18, and 1 point for 38 points but the median score would be 14 which times 3 is 42 meaning you get more points for not playing.
I also dislike this because in traditional fantasy sports, to my knowledge, you can't just say "I want the average score of all running backs across the league for my rb1 slot" (which btw would be really stupid)
|
Right. One item I would have in the rule would be that the commissioner would have to approve the usage--or, the draft runner for that draft AND whichever draft runner was scheduled to run the most drafts (or second-most, if the first two were the same person), in the event that the commissioner is the one asking or is unavailable--and would have to be informed of the specific reasons prior to approving.
I had considered the "more points for not playing" part--I don't like that myself--and figured that usage should be very tightly controlled. As in, there has to be a specific reason to invoke it.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons
"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk
