View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-12-2016, 19:09
Jeffrafa's Avatar
Jeffrafa Jeffrafa is offline
Robotics Addict
AKA: Jeff Lewis
FRC #1425 (Error Code)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Wilsonville, OR
Posts: 165
Jeffrafa has a brilliant futureJeffrafa has a brilliant futureJeffrafa has a brilliant futureJeffrafa has a brilliant futureJeffrafa has a brilliant futureJeffrafa has a brilliant futureJeffrafa has a brilliant futureJeffrafa has a brilliant futureJeffrafa has a brilliant futureJeffrafa has a brilliant futureJeffrafa has a brilliant future
1.1 Pump (am-3227) Really an improvement?

I noticed AndyMark has come out with a new compressor as an alternate to the Viair 00090.

The primary claims about it seem to be that it has a higher 1.1 CFM output (legal limit per 2016 R79), and that it has a higher rated duty cycle (15% vs 9% on the Viair).

A quick glance at some of the specifications makes me doubt the value here though.

1.1 Pump:
  • 3.37 lbs
  • 15% Duty Cycle
  • 1.1 cfm @ 0 psi
  • 0.26 cfm @ 100psi
  • Dimensions: 3.27"x6.75"x5.25"
  • ~31 sec - Claimed time to fill (1) 574ml tank 0-110 psi

Viair 090:
  • 2.4 lbs
  • 9% Duty Cycle
  • 0.88 cfm @ 0 psi
  • 0.39 cfm @ 100psi
  • Dimensions: 2.11"x4.53"x5.94"
  • ~13 sec - Claimed time to fill (1) 574ml tank 0-120 psi

Based on the listed specifications, the new one has a little better duty cycle - which may make it a little more reliable. Otherwise it weighs nearly a pound more, takes up more space, and has ~30% less volume output at 100psi - where it matters for topping off during the match. Even the stated fill times for a tank are worse than the Viair.

I like the look of the larger heatsink, but between the weight penalty and the lower ouptut at pressure, I'm not seeing the advantage.

Am I missing something here?
__________________
Team 1425 Alumnus and Mentor

I am KF7JDK - What's your callsign?
Reply With Quote