Quote:
Originally Posted by TDav540
Well, I guess that's why we have three people evaluating the trade. I'm not saying the AVERAGE first round pick is exponentially more valuable: it's that the difference between them is. So the difference between the #2 and #4 picks is greater than the combination of the two second rounders used in that trade by a reasonable margin.
I agree with your first statement. A team's picklist cannot be used to evaluate a trade's fairness. No team has the same picklist.
|
Technically I thought the system was Eric, and if Eric is unavailable then it goes to the other 3, did I misread?
Anyways, I thought to the reason we were approving trades was to make sure nothing fishy was going on(two teams pooling picks, etc.). I'm not sure why everyone is up in arms if one team gets a better deal out a trade. Here's a secret, a team will only make a trade when they think they're getting the better deal out of it, so by proxy, someone will always be getting the bigger end of the stick at the end of the day. If one team is happy with 2 2nd round increases, and the other team is happy 1 1st round increase, and there seems to be no shady dealings, it should go through.
IMO anyways, I can't vote as its my team, and at the end of the day I don't really mind if our trade gets declined, I'm just arguing for the sake of all trades.