View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-12-2016, 10:53
Daniel_LaFleur's Avatar
Daniel_LaFleur Daniel_LaFleur is offline
Mad Scientist
AKA: Me
FRC #2040 (DERT)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 1,944
Daniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Daniel_LaFleur
Re: [FTC]: Scoring points for the opposing alliance

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whatever View Post
This came up at a state qualifier event.

A team that was already qualified for the state tournament was changing beacons to their opposing alliance color in order to increase their rank points during their last match. This was not a case of an alliance not contesting the beacons but was a team tailing their alliance partner and switching beacons after their alliance partner had changed them. I see nothing in the rules against this behavior but it has caused quite a bit of debate among the students/mentors/parents. I wanted to get a feeling for whether or not the community believes this would be considered gracious professional behavior or not.
Some suggested reading:
Game Theory
Nash Equilibrium
__________________
___________________
"We are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts, Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. "
- Tennyson, Ulysses
Reply With Quote