View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-12-2016, 00:48
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,683
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FTC]: Scoring points for the opposing alliance

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billfred View Post
Sounds to me like the team doing the switching was going rogue.

This was a philosophy debate years and years ago in FRC, before the ranking systems shifted to other tiebreakers. Some (myself included) will argue there's nothing wrong with playing the big-picture game and maximizing your own ranking. Others will argue that it's not in the spirit of the game not to maximize your alliance's score.
But the one thing just about everybody agrees on is that if you're going to play big-picture, and playing big-picture isn't the same as playing to win the match, you need to make sure your entire alliance is on the same page, and agrees to play that way. Otherwise, you look really bad to potential elims partners ("can we trust them to follow the strategy?").
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Reply With Quote