[JosephC]

Here's my thoughts on the systems and district picking overall.

#1 - Eric's system is way too wack, and I don't really see a good way of making it work. Even if you were to change the extra points from 5 to 0, it'd still give more points. You could try to give negative points, but it just seems like a lot of work for not alot of gain.

#2 - IMO, In District Only scoring seems the best. You're picking teams during those drafts for their performance in district, which is better supported by this system over the current one. As for "it sucks not getting points for your teams at events they go to",that doesn't make alot of sense. You don't pick 1114 for Waterloo than be sad when you don't get points for how well they did in GTRE.

#3 - To address the "they get extra experience", why does that matter? You should be factoring that into your picklist. Some teams only do 1 regional, some do 3, its the same thing.

#4 - At the end of the day, its the FIM draft. not the "Teams that are in FIM" draft. Points should be given for what happens in that event, FIM, not what happens to that team at every event. It makes no sense to pick district teams and have what happens outside of the event they were drafted for(the district) affect their points.

#5 - And finally, 27 was drafted at Northern Lights, but with the current system, those points also go to whoever drafts them in FIM? Doesn't make much sense tbh.