Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether
Maybe provides some insight: the above is algebraically equivalent to
Vn+1 = Vn + An∙dt;
Xn+1 = Xn + dt∙(Vn+Vn+1)/2 + ½∙An∙dt2
|
..so counting the constant acceleration term twice in the position calculation mostly offsets not counting the jerk in the velocity calculation..at least in this case.