View Single Post
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-12-2016, 22:34
Richard Wallace's Avatar
Richard Wallace Richard Wallace is offline
I live for the details.
FRC #3620 (Average Joes)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Southwestern Michigan
Posts: 3,620
Richard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond repute
Re: New AndyMark Product Game Hint???

My simple minded calculation of stress on the 4" wheel in question:

The wheel's outer section ("rim") is about 5 mm thick, 25 mm wide, and 320 mm long. Its volume is about 40 cc. Assume its density is about 1.5 g/cc so its mass is about 60 gram or 0.13 lb.

At 9000 rev/min, the "rim" has ~4400g centripetal acceleration, or ~570 lb. centripetal load. This stress acts on the spokes and is divided equally among them, at least until the wheel loses symmetry by deforming. So each spoke takes one-eleventh of the centripetal load, or 52 lb. That spoke stress is born by the same cross-section as the rim, or about 0.2 square inch, so the material must withstand ~ 260 PSI.

Neoprene yields somewhere above 500 PSI. How much higher? Probably depends on the durometer.

Please, will a real mechanical engineer check this for me? I know it ignores stress-rise in corners, for example. Those will be more significant for the AM design than for the tear-drop spoke flex-grip rollers we've bought from McMaster-Carr.
__________________
Richard Wallace

Mentor since 2011 for FRC 3620 Average Joes (St. Joseph, Michigan)
Mentor 2002-10 for FRC 931 Perpetual Chaos (St. Louis, Missouri)
since 2003

I believe in intuition and inspiration. Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution. It is, strictly speaking, a real factor in scientific research.
(Cosmic Religion : With Other Opinions and Aphorisms (1931) by Albert Einstein, p. 97)
Reply With Quote