Quote:
Originally Posted by KSPRUL
I'm sure this will be an unpopular perspective....but here goes.
As a long term supporter of FIRST and as a mentor of FRC teams in the New York area I find myself reminiscing for a time when students could not just browse for an answer to the challenges set by FIRST.
No disrespect meant to the engineers and mentors taking part in robot in 3 days. Just my 2 cents.
|
Time for some secret sauce: if you "just browsed" for the Team Cockamamie answer to FIRST Stronghold, you were in for a bad time. The frame lacked a real bellypan and yielded within a few days of launches over the rock wall, the kicker (which required that minimal belly pan) was inconsistent as heck, electronics maintenance and packaging were lolno, and from time to time we'd lose the boulder sailing over the defenses. I think the radical difference between it and last year's Garnet Squadron robot speaks for itself.
But perhaps we gave someone some ideas (like how we made the AM14U3 intake kit sit lower than stock), so maybe we contributed a thing or two to the mix.
