View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread Yesterday, 16:05
Kevin Ainsworth's Avatar
Kevin Ainsworth Kevin Ainsworth is offline
Registered User
FRC #2451 (Pwnage)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 70
Kevin Ainsworth has much to be proud ofKevin Ainsworth has much to be proud ofKevin Ainsworth has much to be proud ofKevin Ainsworth has much to be proud ofKevin Ainsworth has much to be proud ofKevin Ainsworth has much to be proud ofKevin Ainsworth has much to be proud ofKevin Ainsworth has much to be proud of
Re: Variable Speed Gearboxes?

In respect to a CVT transmission, too much cost, weight and complexity for an FRC robot. Plus electric motors produce their peak torque at 0 rpm which is a big reason for a multi-speed transmission in the first place.

Zero turn drive systems ,riding lawnmowers/Bobcats, use a hydrostatic transmission on each side and a single engine powers both sides of the drivetrain. It would be really cool to build a single 6 CIM transmission that powers two hydrostatic drive units. Except for the fact that it wouldn't be FRC legal.

Argo units and other off-road atv's use a mechanical version of a zero turn system. There are trade offs in the ability to vary the turning speed of the inside and outside tires. Read more below.
http://www.argome.com/recreational/w...etaila3d1.html

In the end, an FRC dual transmission tank drive train is the lightest, least complicated option.
Reply With Quote