Thread: Fuel Vs. Gears
View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2017, 23:27
TimTheGreat's Avatar
TimTheGreat TimTheGreat is offline
ArchdukeTim
FRC #1418 (Vae Victis)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Falls Church
Posts: 238
TimTheGreat has a spectacular aura aboutTimTheGreat has a spectacular aura aboutTimTheGreat has a spectacular aura about
Re: Fuel Vs. Gears

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aventek View Post
My team (3019) has decided to go for gears and here is our logic:[indent]For autonomous the gear is a clear winner, even if you shot and made all ten high goal shots in auto that is only 10 points, and if you shot all ten in low goal that is even worse at 3 points.
I don't think you should think about just the points. Think about the kPA too. If you put the gear on during auto, you do get those 60 points, which sounds like a dream because it's so easy. But consider this.

You score 10 points, but also gain 10 kPA. You're 50 points behind what you would be, yet 10 kPA closer to threshold pressure of 40. Now in teleop, you collect a gear, and put it on the peg. Now you get the 40 points because the rotor is on. So we're at 10 kPA and 50 pts (10 pts behind). If you went with the gear, you'd need to shoot 30 balls in to catch up to kPa.
__________________
There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult.



2012 - Gracious Professionalism - Greater DC
2014 - Regional Finalist - Virginia | Industrial Design - Virginia | Regional Finalist - Greater DC
2015 - Innovation in Control - Greater DC
2016 - District Event Winner - VAHAY | Innovation in Control - VAHAY | District Event Winner - MDBET | Industrial Design - MDBET | District Champion - CHCMP | Innovation in Control - CHCMP
Reply With Quote