Thread: Fuel Vs. Gears
View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2017, 23:39
Aventek Aventek is offline
Registered User
AKA: Kyler Novotny
FRC #3019 (Firebird Robotics)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 8
Aventek is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Fuel Vs. Gears

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimTheGreat View Post
I don't think you should think about just the points. Think about the kPA too. If you put the gear on during auto, you do get those 60 points, which sounds like a dream because it's so easy. But consider this.

You score 10 points, but also gain 10 kPA. You're 50 points behind what you would be, yet 10 kPA closer to threshold pressure of 40. Now in teleop, you collect a gear, and put it on the peg. Now you get the 40 points because the rotor is on. So we're at 10 kPA and 50 pts (10 pts behind). If you went with the gear, you'd need to shoot 30 balls in to catch up to kPa.
That is a very valid point, my main argument there is that you have to have a semi-fast shooter to make all 10 reliably within 15 seconds. Obviously the dream would be to place a gear and instantly get your team 10kPa both during auto. The kPa is pretty valuable considering it would take 3 to 9x more balls to get that amount in teleop. I think shooting for high goal in auto is a good option, i would just like to explore it more and see how difficult it would be with starting position, for example whether you could start in a good spot to fire the 10. Even if the main focus of my teams theoretical bot is gears, a 10kPa lead would be very nice and look much better than pure gears in finals/championships. Thank you for the input!
Reply With Quote