Thread: Wide vs. Tall
View Single Post
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2017, 22:58
Munchskull's Avatar
Munchskull Munchskull is offline
CAD Designer/ Electrical Consaltant
AKA: Anthony Cardinali
FRC #0997 (Spartan Robotics)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 532
Munchskull is a splendid one to beholdMunchskull is a splendid one to beholdMunchskull is a splendid one to beholdMunchskull is a splendid one to beholdMunchskull is a splendid one to beholdMunchskull is a splendid one to beholdMunchskull is a splendid one to beholdMunchskull is a splendid one to behold
Re: Wide vs. Tall

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donut View Post
I appreciate that the GDC made sure both robot size constraints have identical volumes. No storing extra balls in one config versus the other.

The early ideas were that we will likely not climb, which makes a short and wide robot most likely.
That said the tall one has a smaller volume in the frame perimeter.
__________________
“In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not.” ― Anonymous
Anthony Cardinali
4th year of FRC
Class of 2017



Reply With Quote