Quote:
Originally posted by DCA Fan
On a side note W3C compliance would be a pain for me to deal with, all my programming is messy, messy, messy. It's like a maze in there.
|
Yeah... I know some have talked about W3C...
My thought is:
There really are very few sites that actually are W3C compliant. (Heck,
www.usfirst.org doesn't even begin to be w3c... it's doctype is missing (ex: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> ) , and cd is missing a content type (ex: <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">) ) If two major first sites don't begin to meet the first two "points" of W3C, why should I have to worry about my every tag? However, I would recommend viewing a site it a few types of browsers (IE, Netscape, Mozilla, ...) with at different sizes (800x600, 1024x786) using different speeds (56k, 128k, 500k, ...) to make sure that a site can be viewed by most people.