|
Re: Defensive Robots/Strategies?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MARS_James
I think designing a robot to do both is a good idea, but during an actual match post Auto, it is better to focus on one task or the other.
|
I don't agree with the boldfaced text. Granted, neither of us will know with certainty until the game is played, but consider this scenario:
Say Robots A, B, and C are on an alliance. Robots A and B can score a total of five gears. Robot C can place up to three gears and play defense. If A and B place their five gears (plus the free gear), the alliance engages two rotors (80 points). If A, B, and C place their maximum eight gears, the alliance engages three rotors (120 points). However, if A and B place their five gears and C places one gear then plays defense, the alliance still engages three rotors (still 120 points) plus they gain whatever havoc C wreaks on their opponents.
__________________
2016-present, Mentor, FRC 2791 - Shaker Robotics
2016: Tech Valley SF (5236, 2791, 3624) and Quality, Finger Lakes SF (5254, 2791, 2383), Battlecry@WPI Winner (195, 2791, 501), Robot Rumble Winner (2791, 195, 6463)
2016-present, Mentor, FRC 1257 - Parallel Universe
2016: Mount Olive Winner (1257, 5624, 1676), Bridgewater-Raritan Finalist (1257, 25, 3340, 555) and GP, MAR CMP Winner (225, 341, 1257), Archimedes SF (4003, 4564, 5842, 1257), IRI Invite
2012-2015, Student, FRC 1257 - Parallel Universe
2015: Mount Olive QF (1257, 1811, 1923) and Safety Award, North Brunswick Finalist (11, 193, 1257) and Team Spirit and Safety Awards
2014: Clifton Winner (1626, 869, 1257), MAR CMP QF (1257, 293, 303)
2013: TCNJ Safety Award
2012: Mount Olive QF (204, 303, 1257)
Last edited by Brian Maher : 10-01-2017 at 00:34.
|