View Single Post
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2017, 01:30
MARS_James's Avatar
MARS_James MARS_James is offline
Always Scouting
AKA: James Comstock
FRC #0179 (The Children of The Swamp)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Jupiter, Florida
Posts: 1,968
MARS_James has a reputation beyond reputeMARS_James has a reputation beyond reputeMARS_James has a reputation beyond reputeMARS_James has a reputation beyond reputeMARS_James has a reputation beyond reputeMARS_James has a reputation beyond reputeMARS_James has a reputation beyond reputeMARS_James has a reputation beyond reputeMARS_James has a reputation beyond reputeMARS_James has a reputation beyond reputeMARS_James has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to MARS_James
Re: Defensive Robots/Strategies?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Maher View Post
I don't agree with the boldfaced text. Granted, neither of us will know with certainty until the game is played, but consider this scenario:

Say Robots A, B, and C are on an alliance. Robots A and B can score a total of five gears. Robot C can place up to three gears and play defense. If A and B place their five gears (plus the free gear), the alliance engages two rotors (80 points). If A, B, and C place their maximum eight gears, the alliance engages three rotors (120 points). However, if A and B place their five gears and C places one gear then plays defense, the alliance still engages three rotors (still 120 points) plus they gain whatever havoc C wreaks on their opponents.
Sorry i failed to elaborate on this my point was more so, if your tasked with playing defense, getting a gear is not an effective strategy. If your tasked with getting gears, playing defense is not an effective strategy, however if your task is put up x gears what you do after/inbetween is up to you but get those x gears.
__________________
Driving Record: 24-8
Coaching Record: 66-31
2014 South Florida Regional Woodie Flowers Finalist


Reply With Quote