View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2017, 12:34
mman1506's Avatar
mman1506 mman1506 is offline
Hater of Tiny Molex Connectors
AKA: Marcus Quintilian
no team (WARP7)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 808
mman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond reputemman1506 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: (New)matics advice

Quote:
Originally Posted by jfitz0807 View Post
We used a double solenoid for shifting because we wanted to use pneumatic pressure for both shifting directions rather than relying on a spring inside the cylinder. Specifically we used very small pancake shifters. To use a dual port cylinder like this, the double solenoid is the way to go.
I don't think that's correct. As Ari423 explained above both single solenoids and double solenoids can charge both sides of the pneumatic cylinder and neither setup requires a return spring in the cylinder. The only practical advantage of a double solenoid in FRC is that they won't return to a default state when the robot is powered off which can be useful in certain situations but certainly not shifting.
__________________
2014-2015: FRC 865 Warp7 Team Captain
2016: FRC 865 Mentor

2017: Free Agent Mentor, Inspector
Reply With Quote