View Single Post
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2017, 14:06
Kevin Sevcik's Avatar
Kevin Sevcik Kevin Sevcik is offline
(Insert witty comment here)
FRC #0057 (The Leopards)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,745
Kevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Sevcik Send a message via Yahoo to Kevin Sevcik
Re: Realistic high goal scoring rate

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
This isn't 2016 - volume and accuracy are tradeoffs where the right answer very well may be on the side of volume. Turreted shooter in 2009 could be more accurate than dumpers, but dumpers certainly were the more dominant design in general that year. This year's game has five times as many game pieces as 2009!
I am in complete agreement with this, actually. The important shooter metric is balls scored per second, not accuracy or balls fired per second. Erring on the side of volume is almost certainly preferred because it's probably easier to increase accuracy for a high volume system than to increase volume for a high accuracy system. I think it IS interesting that if you're pursuing a single stream shooter*, at some point you have to start backing away from the goal to increase your rate of fire without running balls into each other.

*How long do you think until the first joke about crossing the streams?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
I don't think that's how it works. The motor is only at max power spinning half its free speed at full voltage, IE if the load the motor is under is slowing it down that much. If you're just spinning the motor at half its free speed with speed control, you're just applying a bit more than 6 volts to the motor (a bit more to account for friction losses etc). You definitely do want to be spinning a flywheel at less than 100% speed so it has some headroom to recover with, but I don't think it's exactly half voltage or half free speed either.
Like I said, I need to revisit my spreadsheet to better account for this. But two things are true about my statement:
1. If your wheel slows down by x% per ball, the fastest way to spin it back up to target speed is at at the peak mechanical power point. (Physics, that) And the peak power is at 12V and 50% free speed.
2. Peak power is the MOST power you'll ever get out of the motor. That's 337W for a single CIM. If it takes 33J to fire a ball, the most balls you can fire without slowing down is 10 balls per second. And that's going to be with the motor running at 1/2 free speed. If the motor's running any faster, it won't put enough energy back into the system and the wheel will slow until energy out = energy in.
__________________
The difficult we do today; the impossible we do tomorrow. Miracles by appointment only.

Lone Star Regional Troubleshooter

Last edited by Kevin Sevcik : 12-01-2017 at 14:16.
Reply With Quote