Quote:
Originally posted by gsensel
I think middle would be the best because it would throw another variable to wreck a score, but it would also give the opportunity to repair the score. Where as at the end it would screw a score or people would not really have a lot to do depending on what they did during the match.
|
i was thinking the same thing when i chose the middle. it would be kindof like the wall this year. whoever got the wall had a tremendous advantage in the match, but the other teams could still come back and win.
actually, i just had another idea. how about instead of just scoring points for robot position at the end of the match, points are also awarded for position at the end of autonomous. that would really spice things up. it would make things more fair for new teams, they could go to a scoring spot before autonomous, not move anywhere, and then score points for doing it. this would throw in a whole new batch of aspects to the strategy. should robots try to manipulate scoring objects, get positioning points, or really take a gamble and try to do both!?