View Single Post
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-01-2017, 14:39
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is offline
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,655
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: FRC Bearing Load Ratings (Climber Winch)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BJC View Post
I also do not know the load ratings. However, this would be a situation where Thunderhex is ideal. The thunderhex bearings are round so you are far less likely to crack the inner bearing race upon high/impact loading while maintaining hex shaft functionality.

Cheers, Bryan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
I would be quite nervous about supporting the weight of your robot on an aluminum hex shaft this year, depending on the implementation. Have spares ready, at the very least.
To be clear, with the proposed climber design that inspired this comment for my team, we were planning on use 1215 steel hex, not aluminum (including Thunderhex). Given that compression of balls in our intake caused deformation in a ~24" piece of Thunderhex last year, I am definitely shying away from Thunderhex and any aluminum shafts as a primary weight bearing piece of our climbing mechanism.

Turning down the corners of the steel to fit into a Thunderhex bearing is a possibility, as is hex broaching a larger round bushing to fit the hex.
__________________
Being correct doesn't mean you don't have to explain yourself.
Reply With Quote