Thread: Fuel Capacities
View Single Post
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-01-2017, 17:57
JesseK's Avatar
JesseK JesseK is offline
Expert Flybot Crasher
FRC #1885 (ILITE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 3,733
JesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Fuel Capacities

Quote:
Originally Posted by billybarule View Post
All, I appreciate the responses thus far. I hope we can keep this thread on topic though, and continue to discuss Fuel Capacities of hoppers, logic/rationale behind those choices, etc.
Particularly interesting to me thus far has been the choices between HG and LG; you know there are teams out there that will focus on one or the other, but as a HG-focused team, we haven't given much thought to the LG mindset, so it's helpful and insightful.

(Sorry for the derail)

One of the concepts I've read about elsewhere is the mindset that throughput rewards more than accuracy.

An insight from my team's analysis that I haven't seen discussed much on the forums is that to decrease cycle times, in the early-mid game a team would simply re-direct missed HG shots into the LG. In late game, that same team would redirect missed shots back into the hopper to retry HG. The point is to get as many balls as possible onto the same side of the field as your BOILER as early as possible. If the opponents couldn't keep up with the sheer flow of balls, there would effectively become a cycle of balls from the overflow/feeder station to the boiler, reducing cycle times.

This would then require enough hopper capacity to get control of as many balls as possible early, while also having several ways to control entry into the hopper. It would inform nearly every design decision on the robot:
- Taller robot volume for the easy passive redirect
- Open frame or tiny frame for a floor intake
- Any intake would push balls up from the bottom into the hopper in order to make a bubble of balls on top. Maximize the hopper or bust!
- Want a bulldozer for the balls we can't fit into the hopper.
- Who needs indexing? A 15"-wide shooter would work wonders for throughput.
- The hopper needs to expand to the maximum volume - i.e. to the bumpers' edges.
- Single speed transmissions - 2-speeds take up to much volume
- The 4 available non-drivetrain 40A ports on the PDB are going to intakes and the shooter
- 4WD WCD, Chain-In-Tube becomes one of the best plausible space-saving designs
- Hope we can make a climber in a tiny space (for average teams it is unlikely to have confidence this is a definite 'yes' in the few days after kickoff).
__________________

Drive Coach, 1885 (2007-present)
2017 Scoring Model
CAD Library | GitHub

Last edited by JesseK : 23-01-2017 at 18:00.
Reply With Quote