View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-01-2017, 09:54
JesseK's Avatar
JesseK JesseK is offline
Expert Flybot Crasher
FRC #1885 (ILITE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 3,733
JesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Opinion on Legality of Sharp Components

Since [I04] implies that team-supplied ropes are included in the official definition of ROPE, [G15-H] may mean teams may not damage their own ropes.

Here is my Q&A question on that relationship. In hindsight it could have been better-worded, but I'd already spent a day trying to figure out how to say it in order to prevent the "the LRI will judge it..." response. It effectively calls into question what the difference between damage and wear & tear is for ropes - which applies in any climber using an abrasive design for capture. It came up for us, so I had to ask.
__________________

Drive Coach, 1885 (2007-present)
2017 Scoring Model
CAD Library | GitHub

Last edited by JesseK : 25-01-2017 at 10:12.
Reply With Quote