View Single Post
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2017, 16:16
Cory's Avatar
Cory Cory is offline
Registered User
AKA: Cory McBride
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 6,825
Cory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cory
Re: Machining Sponsorship for FRC Teams

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oblarg View Post
Okay, let's take this and run with it.

Money is fungible. Is it substantively different if said tech company donates $5000 to my team, and specifies that it is for machining, or if they donate $5000 without said specification and we spend it on machining? Even if the budget works out exactly the same regardless of said specification?

I think it's pretty silly to argue that these are somehow fundamentally different situations - in fact, if we say that they are, then anyone can get around this rule simply by going to sponsors who have donated money and asking those sponsors to specify (somewhat meaninglessly) that the money is to be used for machining. Which means that, if we follow this logic, any machining that is ultimately paid for by money that comes from a sponsor ought to not count towards the robot budget.

If this is indeed how the rule works: Great! The rule is effectively not there, and there's no problem.

But I doubt that this is how the rule works, and thus the rule seems utterly defective.
I don't think either of those situations is different. Both would require you to account for the FMV on your CAW, in my (not official) opinion.

The situation I think is different is you go to company XYZ and say "Hey can you make us part ABC?". They say yes. They then either make it themselves or farm the work out to someone else and return a finished product to you.

I think in this case you could exclude the cost of their labor as they are donating those specific machined parts to you, not cash which you are allocating towards machining. Whether they fabricated those parts internally or externally is of no consequence to you because money did not flow from you to a vendor in exchange for fabricated parts.

That being said I think this is a stupid comparison because it's a lot easier to find a machine shop willing to donate (as a random example) $5000 of labor than it is to find a company willing to donate $5000 earmarked for use at a machine shop. Nor would $5,000 of your cold hard cash best be used paying a machine shop to make parts, regardless of whether it was legal.
__________________
2001-2004: Team 100
2006-Present: Team 254
Reply With Quote