View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-01-2002, 20:25
Matt Attallah's Avatar
Matt Attallah Matt Attallah is offline
Now at sub 14's in a 5000lb vehicle
AKA: Maher Attallah
FRC #0005 (Robocards)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Detroit area, Michigan
Posts: 1,660
Matt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Matt Attallah Send a message via MSN to Matt Attallah Send a message via Yahoo to Matt Attallah
Um, i think tracks would be better if...

Wouldnt' tracks be better if you are dealing with some high-forces on wheels. Where you would eather sink-in too much (than you are carying too much weight!) or wouldn't your coefficent of friction become so much that wheels won't do it? Wheels just place the weight on a point, while tracks place it over a distance. So, in my opnion (sp?) if you some how can "tilt" the goals to get more traction, i say go with tracks. They turn on a dime, and i personally like the experience with them. My team (#5) got feather weight in the finals 3 (?) at GLR, when everyone thought we broke our bar hanging-mechanisim and we didn't hahahaha , we weighed like 105 or something lbs, and we where pushing bigger, taller, very much heavier robots than us. I say go w/ tanks cuz' of my personal experience with it, and i think the motors will like it better when going straight, especially with a gear-box!!
__________________
That rug really tied the room together...