View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-01-2002, 09:15
Raul's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Raul Raul is offline
Somewhat Useful Person
no team (Formerly - Wildstang)
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Greenville, TX
Posts: 599
Raul has a reputation beyond reputeRaul has a reputation beyond reputeRaul has a reputation beyond reputeRaul has a reputation beyond reputeRaul has a reputation beyond reputeRaul has a reputation beyond reputeRaul has a reputation beyond reputeRaul has a reputation beyond reputeRaul has a reputation beyond reputeRaul has a reputation beyond reputeRaul has a reputation beyond repute
Oh well, I may as well throw in my 2 cents.

We realized that lifting the goal with the old rules was the "differentiator" this year and were also looking at a design to clamp the pipe and lift the goal. It was going to be more complex than I would like and would probably make it much more challenging to stay under the weight limit. We had a design but I was getting headaches trying to find a simpler, more elegant way to do it. Now I can throw away the design and hard thinking that went along with it. Oh well.

But, I accept this new ruling as a bonus that we will happily accept and find another way to differentiate our design. Life goes on.

In regards to it making it harder on the referees - I disagree. I think this rule makes it easier. Here is why. I Imagine with all the pushing and shoving that will occur that in many cases a goal will get wedged on top a robot frames. Also, the complex goal lifting mechanisms would have been harder to judge if they "accidently" or "purposely" made contact with the steel angle when grabbing or lifting..

Raul