Quote:
Originally posted by jon
ahem. mySQL is better.
|
ahem. define "better" - on what terms, sure it may be able to hander larger numbers of records quicker, but who needs that?
Lets say you scout every team in every match at a regional, 100 or so matches, 4 teams per match, thats 400 scouting records... say you do double the scouting at nationals, thats 800 scouting records. I personally don't think you will see more than 1% speed difference between access and mysql at 800 records.
just my $.02
Tom