View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-05-2003, 12:50
Jnadke Jnadke is offline
Go Badgers!
#0093
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 775
Jnadke is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Jnadke Send a message via AIM to Jnadke Send a message via Yahoo to Jnadke
Quote:
Originally posted by ChrisH
I'm not sure if it would be considered a true CVT or not. But you can use an epicyclic or planetary gear system to create a similar effect. As GregT mentioned, it does require two torque sources and the ratio is changed by changing their relative rotational speeds.
I don't think I'd consider that a CVT. Yes, I've studied it before, and even created my own design. It's merely a dual-input viariable speed gearbox.

As for efficiency, in high speed it is extremely inefficient, because you must provide power to the central motor in order to give a surface for the high speed motor to react from. But it does serve its purpose since we have a limited set of motors to work from. I suppose you could make it fairly efficient if there was only a 2:1 difference between the two motors.
__________________
The best moments of our lives fall in two categories: those that did happen and those that did not.

Last edited by Jnadke : 21-05-2003 at 13:16.