View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-06-2003, 15:01
FotoPlasma FotoPlasma is offline
\: |
no team
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,900
FotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to FotoPlasma
I think that, realistically, you want to have the elimination rounds played exactly like the finals. Changing the alliance system between the stages will be confusing for spectators, and will force many teams to change tactics. This, combined with the supposed cooperation aspect of the game, for the past two years, and even more so for three years ago, would be a step backward, in my eyes.

I'm generally against things that just outright don't make sense, and this doesn't really. The point of the competition, overall, is not seeding high.
__________________
I played hacky sack with Andy Baker.

2001-2004: Team 258, The Sea Dawgs
2005: Team 1693, The Robo Lobos
Reply With Quote