Quote:
Originally posted by Rich Wong
3 vs. 3 games may become the way of the future as the number of teams keep growing.
Some Regionals has too just many teams competing in just two days.
By having 3vs3, more team will played in less games as compare to 2vs2.
|
In capacity limited events, though, such as New York City, Long Island, and Seattle ...three traditionally small regionals... 3 vs. 3 wouldn't do as much to increase throughput as it would to decrease downtime between matches.
While each regional could then play more than the 10 or 11 matches per team average that we've previously seen, is it worth the expense of the subsequent lost repair and maintenance time?