View Single Post
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-06-2003, 22:56
Mike Schroeder's Avatar
Mike Schroeder Mike Schroeder is offline
Gone the way of the dinosaur
AKA: "Big Mike"
no team
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: North Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 1,872
Mike Schroeder has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schroeder has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schroeder has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schroeder has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schroeder has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schroeder has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schroeder has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schroeder has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schroeder has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schroeder has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schroeder has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Mike Schroeder Send a message via Yahoo to Mike Schroeder
Quote:
Originally posted by Kevin A
M - as Doug said, you would still have 2 players out there, so you wouldn't necessarily loose.
maybe someone could help me with this one,

2V2 - 1 partner showes up, its 2 robots against 1 which means the one has to worry about 2

3V3 - 1 partner doesntr show up 2 against 3, so in this case, 2 robots coud easily both have to worry about 2 robots, because they would be running around playing defense. i really do not see an improvement, because there will always the one extra, i think that 2 v 2 is a nice ammount, any more and it would just cause alot more confusion
__________________
GOT SEARCH?

"We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard"-JFK
Reply With Quote