Quote:
Originally posted by Tytus Gerrish
Well, I dont have the numbers BUT!, why dont you ask the people who make Dual-engined Helicopters and helicoptor engines and the gearboxex that merge their power. ie, General Eletric, Sickorsky, Alison, Lycombing ,Textron, Etc....
Dont Get me wrong The constructive critisim is good But some of you can ,Realy Push it!
|
I'd bet that those people did a lot of math and analyses of things before they
ever set pen to paper, so to speak.
I'm not one to throw around praise of respect lightly and I think most people aren't. Show us something that
proves this concept works, either through your own calculations or by those of someone else, and you'll earn more respect.
If you don't want people to offer suggestions, criticisms, or flat out tell you that your idea sucks, don't post it online. That's the nature of the internet. You've given nobody any reason to expect that your idea he has any worth.
I see a nice picture that copy-cats something you may have seen somewhere else. It shows no appreciation for the knowledge required to pull it off. Sure, there's a potential for it to evolve into something useful, but that potential is completely meaningless unless you're willing to harness and go to the next step. Making grammatically horrendous claims that we ought to trust you and that it will work is a waste of my time.
I'm not going to blindly praise you. Show me a real reason or leave me alone. A lot of the mentors here, me being in a different, lower realm entirely, work their behind off to make sure that their students have a real grasp of the concepts at work and that they're not making stuff up and getting lucky by it. It's insulting to them that you write off their contributions with your assumptions and crass attitude.