View Single Post
  #66   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-07-2003, 22:11
dez250 dez250 is offline
54... What a good number!
no team
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Upstate NY / Manchester, NH
Posts: 1,721
dez250 has a reputation beyond reputedez250 has a reputation beyond reputedez250 has a reputation beyond reputedez250 has a reputation beyond reputedez250 has a reputation beyond reputedez250 has a reputation beyond reputedez250 has a reputation beyond reputedez250 has a reputation beyond reputedez250 has a reputation beyond reputedez250 has a reputation beyond reputedez250 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to dez250
Quote:
Originally posted by KWachowski27
Well, yea, i mean of course they would come up with some sort of security, but it won't be any less secure than it currently is. What i mean is that they could basically network the robots as devices and they would have an "admin" control or something allowing them to read and send data and whatnot. It could even use a popular protocol such as IPX/SPX.
Well i really doubt the robots would ever be placed on a network type of set up because of the logistics of it, with the current set up any robot can be placed on any comp port and be ran and controlled with out individual set up based on that bot, but how your saying, this would need allot more individual set up and updating through out the event. with this not only would it cost more... but it would also go back to the basis of more volunteers/staff needed.
~Mike
__________________
#5

-Michael Dessingue