I dont think anyone here is particualrly saying that they are anti chairmans. its still a great facet of FIRST. But to make it mandatory is to give teams another reason to worry about during the build period. Try concentrating on two major things at once in six weeks, from design to build to test, and having another chairmans award group going on as well, not to mention worrying about logistics.
it can be hard to do all of the above when you have less than 30 team members, or infrequent attendance. theres nothing wrong with the chairmans award, it just should not be mandatory
Quote:
Originally posted by oneangrydwarf
I dont see why people are so anti-chairmans award.
(incase anyone was wondering i voted for mandatory executive summary but not CA)
|