View Single Post
  #35   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-08-2003, 06:40
FotoPlasma FotoPlasma is offline
\: |
no team
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,900
FotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to FotoPlasma
Re: Comparison: Mac OS X, Windows XP, Linux

Quote:
Originally posted by DougHogg
To anyone interested in operating systems,

I just ran across this comparison of Mac OS X, Windows XP and Linux, updated on Aug. 11, 2003:

http://thetechnozone.com/smartbuyers...otout-2003.htm
Heh. Maybe I'm just too tired to take a serious look at it (not saying I didn't read it, mind you), but I'd definitely file that under H for Humor. That's some funny stuff.

E.G.

Quote:
Network Protocols supported natively
  • Mac OS X: TCP/IP, AFP, SLP, SMB/CIFS, WebDAV and NFS file services (etc.) Experimental support for IP over 1394.
  • Windows XP: TCP/IP, WebDAV, IP over 1394, IPX, others.
  • Linux: many
Not to say that it's not a very good analysis. It really is pretty good, and worth reading.
__________________
I played hacky sack with Andy Baker.

2001-2004: Team 258, The Sea Dawgs
2005: Team 1693, The Robo Lobos