Thread: Drill motors
View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-08-2003, 13:14
FotoPlasma FotoPlasma is offline
\: |
no team
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,900
FotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to FotoPlasma
Granted, designing and fabricating four of the same gearbox, instead of two each of two seperate designs, can be easier, but it depends on what a team's resources are. Either one could be trivial for a team with professional machine shop support, while a team without that support would probably want a standard design that they could copy for replacements.

I agree with Matt Reiland, however, in that the control system for a swerve drive is probably the more involved part of the design / manufacturing process. Speaking from experience (and I wasn't even the one programming the thing), testing and bugfixing and calibrating and recalibrating and compensating for hardware in software, etc., takes a lot of the time allotted to you for such a project as this.
__________________
I played hacky sack with Andy Baker.

2001-2004: Team 258, The Sea Dawgs
2005: Team 1693, The Robo Lobos