Thread: Linux
View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-08-2003, 12:46
FotoPlasma FotoPlasma is offline
\: |
no team
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,900
FotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond reputeFotoPlasma has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to FotoPlasma
Quote:
Originally posted by Jillian B.
<Edit>

Linux only = Evil if you have ridiculously slow and old laptop that was made for Windows 95.

</Edit>
....

I really gotta get a new laptop, something that actually has enough memory to move.

Jill
Actually, Linux can work quite well on (relatively) slow machines. While it really depends on the hardware configuration of the laptop (some devices might have varrying degrees of support, depending on which kernel you decide to install), Linux can be loaded on practically any x86 system.

One of the drawing points about Linux, as opposed to Windows, is that it can be installed on old(er) machines, and still work perfectly well. I wonder if anyone's tried to install Windows XP on a Pentium 133 (notice that there is no sequel suffix on the word "Pentium"), with 16MB of RAM...
__________________
I played hacky sack with Andy Baker.

2001-2004: Team 258, The Sea Dawgs
2005: Team 1693, The Robo Lobos
Reply With Quote