View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-09-2003, 13:42
Jnadke Jnadke is offline
Go Badgers!
#0093
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 775
Jnadke is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Jnadke Send a message via AIM to Jnadke Send a message via Yahoo to Jnadke
I don't think those are belts, the pulleys are drawn too narrow. Those are chains & sprockets.

Depending on the belt, chains and belts are nearly identical in the concept and function. The difference is that chains are typically more durable and can transfer more torque. If you use v-belts, they usually can transmit a certain amount of torque before they slip (slide without rotating the pulley), which would be a good thing if you have a very high-geared robot and you don't want the breakers tripping.

Other than being lighter and easier to assemble/dis-assemble, belts have no significant advantage over chains & sprockets. Of course there's the whole slip thing, which is good when you're dealing with combustion engines (stall = bad). On robots, however, we seem to like to stall our motors with all the pushing (since nobody has designed a true CVT, yet), so I guess this could be considered a bad thing.
__________________
The best moments of our lives fall in two categories: those that did happen and those that did not.