View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-09-2003, 17:21
MattK's Avatar
MattK MattK is offline
Tap it.
no team
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,084
MattK is a splendid one to beholdMattK is a splendid one to beholdMattK is a splendid one to beholdMattK is a splendid one to beholdMattK is a splendid one to beholdMattK is a splendid one to beholdMattK is a splendid one to beholdMattK is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to MattK
Re: Background Checks

Quote:
Originally posted by Bill Beatty
This issue was brought up over drinks by folks who were "in the know" when we were in Manchester in July. It was presented as something to " protect the students." What a crock!

Some guidelines of a few simple policies put in place by the teams goes a long way to "that" protection. In my opinion, it is really being put in by FIRST to try and protect it's own butt! I am trying to figure out just who makes the call if a person is ineligible depending on the results of the background check?

Hey FIRST. Maybe after passing the check, a simple numbered tattoo on the arm of each participant proving they have passed, because that wouldn't cost very much............

A very disgusted MR. Bill
Even if it is to cover FIRST's butt, it will still protect the students.

FIRST requires that everyone wear safety glasses to protect them, why not this?

I don't think this is FIRST acting as "Big Brother". They are keeping everything confidential and its not like what they have needs any kinda of security clearance... They are going to have nothing more than what presidential campaigns have- trust me I work on one. Its all public information
Reply With Quote